Seismic energy dissipation performance of anti-buckling bracing and component composition parameters analysis
			
	
 
More details
Hide details
	
	
									
				1
				Department of Architecture and Civil engineering, Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology, China
				 
			 
						
				2
				College of Civil and Transportation Engineering, Hohai University, China
				 
			 
						
										
				
				
		
		 
			
			
			
			 
			Submission date: 2023-12-12
			 
		 		
		
			
			 
			Final revision date: 2024-03-02
			 
		 		
		
		
			
			 
			Acceptance date: 2024-04-23
			 
		 		
		
		
			
			 
			Publication date: 2025-03-20
			 
		 			
		 
	
							
					    		
    			 
    			
    				    					Corresponding author
    					    				    				
    					Wei  Zhang   
    					Department of Architecture and Civil engineering, Zhejiang Tongji Vocational College of Science and Technology, China
    				
 
    			
				 
    			 
    		 		
			
																											 
		
	 
		
 
 
Archives of Civil Engineering 2025;71(1):577-594
		
 
 
KEYWORDS
TOPICS
ABSTRACT
Through the finite element method, the finite element models of three kinds of buckling-restrained brace components : cross-shaped square steel tube support, cross-shaped circular steel tube support and circular steel tube support are established. The hysteretic performance of buckling-restrained braces under cyclic loading is analyzed, and the influence of component parameters on the mechanical performance of three kinds of buckling-restrained braces is further analyzed. The results show that the three types of buckling restrained braces have good hysteretic energy dissipation performance, and the cross-shaped square steel tube brace has the best hysteretic energy dissipation performance. The influence of the restraint stiffness ratio of the buckling-restrained brace on the mechanical properties of the three types of buckling-restrained braces is consistent. With the increase of the restraint ratio, the buckling-restrained brace reaches full-section yield. The increase of the width-thickness ratio of the inner core element will cause the yield lag of the buckling-restrained brace, while the lower width-thickness ratio of the inner core element will cause excessive stress concentration. Therefore, it is suggested that the width-thickness ratio of the inner core element should be between 5 and 10. The initial imperfection and connection stiffness of buckling-restrained braces have little effect on the bearing capacity of buckling-restrained braces.